| Glossary
E
Education/Behavior
change: One strategy for preventing injuries and violence. This
strategy involves a set of learning experiences or activities that are
specifically designed to facilitate voluntary adaptations of
behavior
that are conducive to
health.
See also Legislative/Enforcement and Technology/Engineering.
Evaluation: The
systematic collection of information designed to answer specific questions
about the project or program that has been implemented. Types of evaluation
include:
-
Needs assessment: A systematic process for gathering information about
current conditions within a community that underlie the need for an
intervention.
- Formative evaluation: An
evaluation conducted early in the planning stages or early in implementation.
It helps to define the scope of the program or project and to identify
appropriate goals and objectives.
- Process evaluation: Assessing
what activities were implemented, the quality of the implementation, and the
strengths and weaknesses of implementation. Process
evaluation is used to produce useful feedback for program refinement, to determine
which activities were more successful than others, to document successful processes
for future replication and to demonstrate program activities before demonstrating
outcomes.
- Impact evaluation: Systematic process of collecting, analyzing and interpreting
data to assess and evaluate the short-term outcomes of a program.
- Outcome evaluation: Systematic process of collecting, analyzing and interpreting
data to assess and evaluate the long-term outcomes of a program.
Evaluation designs: A
framework which guides the way in which an evaluation is conducted, including
when and from what groups
data will be collected. Types of evaluation designs include:
- Descriptive designs: Designs that are concerned with describing the general
characteristics of the population or program of interest.
Descriptive designs may also allow one to compare these characteristics
between different groups of populations. These comparisons, however, are
unable to prove cause and effect of the program. One example of descriptive
evaluations includes:
- Case study design: Describes program, participants and its outcomes.
May describe the program at one point in time or describe what is occurring
over time.
- Experimental designs: Designs
that are concerned with formally testing a hypothesis about the relationship
of program activities to measurable outcomes. Experimental designs involve
randomly assigning participants to intervention and comparison groups,
and comparing characteristics between these groups. These comparisons
are able to prove cause and effect of the program.
- Quasi-experimental designs: Designs
where the characteristics of the intervention group are compared with
the characteristics in a comparison group (this group does not receive
the intervention), but persons are not randomly assigned
to the different groups. One example of a quasi-experimental design includes:
- Pre/post design: Measurements are taken before
and after the program is implemented.
Evidence-based (also
referred to as science-based): Health
endeavor in which there is informed, explicit and judicious use of evidence
that has been derived from any of a variety of science and social science
research methods.
Experimental designs: A
type of evaluation design that is concerned with formally testing a hypothesis
about the relationship
of program activities to measurable outcomes. Experimental designs involve
randomly assigning participants to intervention and comparison groups,
and comparing characteristics between these groups. These comparisons
are able to prove cause and effect of the program. See
also Evaluation designs.
top
|